To the untrained eye it is possible to mistake certain flowering plants as mosses. Tasmania has a few examples, particularly some of the alpine bristleworts, which are small and turfed and even produce flowering stalks that superficially resemble moss capsules.
Much less likely is it for mosses to be mistaken as flowering plants, but yet, this was exactly what happened to a certain Australian moss by the name of Gigaspermum repens.
G. repens is a moss I had always wanted to see but Tasmania was not the best of places to be looking for it as it more typical of bare dry soils. This spring I was most fortunate to stumble on a small population near a rock outcrop on the summit of Mt Nelson.
The pale silvery quartz colour of the shoots were scarcely half a centimeter tall and reminded me of the ubiquitous Silver Moss (Bryum argenteum). Fortuitously, the plants I found were fertile, and in that state, there was absolutely no mistaking them. The fertile shoots were more than twice the size of the sterile ones and were, for lack of a better word, so pregnant.
Unlike most mosses which have capsules borne on a stalk held above the plant body, the capsules of G. repens were nestled among large modified leaves.
In this fertile state, plants are not dissimilar to minute flowers in bud. The capsule of Gigaspermum repens has a large operculum which falls off when the capsules are ripe, leaving a great gaping mouth and exposing the characteristically large spores (hence ‘Gigaspermum‘ which means large seeds) that are just visible to the naked eye.
These large spores could be mistaken for seeds in a pyxidate capsule, a type of fruit in flowering plants like plantain (Plantago spp.) where the top falls off to release the seeds. The uniqueness of Gigaspermum has inspired bryologists erect a botanical family, the Gigaspermaceae, to accommodate it.
When the great 19th century plant collector Ferdinand von Mueller (1825-1896) found this plant, he allegedly thought it was a flowering plant belonging to the ice plant family (Aizoaceae) and named it Trianthema humillima.
Mueller was a first rate botanical collector and his mis-description is no reflection of the lack of expertise on his part. Mueller was certainly aware of what mosses are. However, this episode does bear testimony to the morphological diversity that mosses can encompass, sans flowers.